LibreOffice Joins the Chorus: Why Dropping Older Windows Support is a Call to Linux Migration
In the ever-evolving landscape of operating systems and productivity software, compatibility and support lifecycles are critical considerations for users and developers alike. Recently, the LibreOffice project, the leading free and open-source office suite, announced a significant shift in its support strategy that sends a clear message: it's time to look beyond older versions of Windows. The Document Foundation, the organization overseeing LibreOffice's development, is preparing to discontinue support for Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 8.1, while also deprecating 32-bit Windows builds, starting with the forthcoming LibreOffice 25.8 release.
This decision isn't happening in a vacuum. It aligns with a growing sentiment within the FOSS community and beyond, urging users to migrate away from aging, unsupported, or soon-to-be-unsupported Windows versions towards more modern, secure, and open platforms, primarily Linux. The looming end of support for Windows 10 in October 2025 is a major catalyst for this conversation, prompting millions of users and organizations to evaluate their options.
The End of an Era for Older Windows
For years, Microsoft has been guiding users away from its older operating systems, but the reality is that millions still cling to Windows 7, 8, and 8.1. Windows 7, despite reaching its official end of life for mainstream support in 2020 (with paid extended security updates ending later for some enterprise users and specific editions like those for cash registers), maintains a stubborn presence on many machines. Its successor, Windows 8, was largely unpopular and quickly superseded by Windows 8.1, which itself saw its extended support conclude in January 2023. Anyone still running these versions is operating on borrowed time, exposed to increasing security vulnerabilities with each passing day.
The Document Foundation's decision to drop support for Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 in LibreOffice 25.8, expected in August, reflects the diminishing returns of maintaining compatibility with these legacy platforms. As software evolves, it often leverages newer operating system features, APIs, and security models that simply aren't available or are poorly implemented in older versions. Continuing to support them requires significant development effort to maintain compatibility layers, work around bugs, and ensure security, diverting resources that could otherwise be used to improve the suite for users on modern systems.
The deprecation of 32-bit Windows builds adds another layer to this shift. While 64-bit computing has been standard for well over a decade, 32-bit systems, or even 64-bit systems with limited RAM (like 4GB or less), might still benefit from 32-bit applications due to memory addressing limitations or specific hardware/software compatibility needs. However, the vast majority of modern hardware and software ecosystems are optimized for 64-bit. Maintaining a separate 32-bit build requires dedicated testing, compilation infrastructure, and debugging, another drain on development resources. While the Document Foundation is currently only *deprecating* 32-bit support, signaling that it might be removed entirely in a future release, it's a clear indicator of the direction of travel.
LibreOffice's Stance: A Call to Action
The Document Foundation isn't just dropping support; they are actively using this moment to advocate for migration. Their blog post, pointedly titled "The end of Windows 10 is approaching, so it's time to consider Linux and LibreOffice," directly links the impending Windows 10 EOL to the opportunity to switch operating systems. This aligns with campaigns like the KDE-backed "End of 10" initiative, which aims to raise awareness about the Windows 10 EOL and provide resources for users looking to transition to Linux.
The core argument is compelling: why invest in upgrading or replacing hardware solely to run a newer version of a proprietary OS when a free, open-source alternative like Linux, paired with a powerful, free office suite like LibreOffice, offers a viable path forward? This is particularly relevant for users with older hardware that might not meet the stringent requirements of Windows 11 or who are hesitant to pay for Windows licenses or Microsoft 365 subscriptions.
Migrating from Windows to Linux can seem daunting, but the ecosystem has matured significantly over the years. User-friendly distributions like Ubuntu, Linux Mint, Fedora, and others offer polished desktop environments and straightforward installation processes. Tools like Distro Chooser attempt to help users find a suitable distribution based on their needs, although the effectiveness of such tools can vary.
The Appeal of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS)
At the heart of LibreOffice's message is the advocacy for FOSS. The Document Foundation emphasizes the freedom and control users gain by moving away from proprietary software models where you often pay for licenses but don't truly 'own' the software or have control over its future development or privacy implications. LibreOffice, as a FOSS project, is developed collaboratively, transparently, and is free to use, distribute, and modify under the terms of its license.
This stands in contrast to the subscription-based model increasingly favored by Microsoft Office 365, which represents an ongoing cost and ties users into a specific ecosystem. While Microsoft Office remains the dominant force in the office suite market, particularly in corporate environments, LibreOffice offers robust compatibility with Microsoft Office formats (like .docx, .xlsx, .pptx) while natively using the Open Document Format (ODF), an international standard that turned 20 years old recently, highlighting its longevity and openness.
LibreOffice's Journey: From OpenOffice to Independence
Understanding LibreOffice's current position requires a brief look at its history. LibreOffice was born out of a fork of OpenOffice.org in 2010. OpenOffice.org was originally developed by Sun Microsystems and later acquired by Oracle. When Oracle's commitment to the project seemed to wane, many key developers left to form The Document Foundation and create LibreOffice, aiming for a more community-driven and independent development model. Oracle eventually donated the remaining OpenOffice.org assets to the Apache Foundation, where it continues to exist as Apache OpenOffice. However, Apache OpenOffice has seen significantly less development activity compared to LibreOffice over the past decade, leading many to recommend LibreOffice as the de facto successor and preferred choice for users seeking a free office suite.
LibreOffice's development has been active and consistent since its inception. The project shifted to a time-based release model, similar to Ubuntu, issuing new versions every six months. The current release is LibreOffice 25.2 (as of early 2025), with 25.8 slated for August. The project also maintains a 'stable' version, which lags behind the 'fresh' releases, offering a more conservative option for users prioritizing stability over the absolute latest features. This stable version (currently 24.8.x) will continue to support older Windows versions for a time, providing a transition window, but the writing is on the wall for legacy OS compatibility in the long term.
Alternatives Beyond LibreOffice
While LibreOffice is the most prominent FOSS alternative to Microsoft Office, it's not the only option available, particularly for users exploring non-Microsoft paths. Other suites like OnlyOffice and WPS Office offer interfaces that some users might find more visually similar to modern Microsoft Office versions. OnlyOffice, for instance, is known for its strong document compatibility and collaborative features. WPS Office offers a free tier but is not open source and includes advertising, which might be a drawback for some.
For users whose needs can be met by a web-based suite, options like ThinkFree (which has a long history, dating back 25 years) offer free tiers. These alternatives demonstrate that the ecosystem of productivity tools is diverse, and users have choices beyond the dominant players, especially when considering a move away from proprietary operating systems.
Technical Implications of Dropping Support
Beyond the philosophical arguments for FOSS and the practical concerns of EOL operating systems, there are significant technical reasons for LibreOffice to drop support for Windows 7, 8, and 8.1. Modern software development relies on contemporary compiler toolchains, libraries, and operating system features. Maintaining compatibility with systems that are over a decade old often means being constrained by the lowest common denominator. This can hinder the adoption of new programming language features, security enhancements, and performance optimizations that are only available on newer OS versions.
For example, modern graphics rendering APIs, improved memory management features, and enhanced security sandboxing capabilities present in Windows 10 and 11 allow developers to build more robust, performant, and secure applications. Supporting older OS versions might require maintaining separate code paths, using older, less efficient APIs, or even foregoing certain features entirely to ensure compatibility. This increases code complexity, makes debugging harder, and slows down the pace of innovation.
The deprecation of 32-bit support is driven by similar factors. The computing world has overwhelmingly moved to 64-bit architectures. Compilers, libraries, and third-party dependencies are increasingly optimized for 64-bit. Maintaining a 32-bit build requires dedicated infrastructure and testing, which is becoming less justifiable as the user base on 32-bit systems shrinks. While there might be niche use cases for 32-bit Windows on older hardware, the long-term trend is clear.
The Migration Path: Challenges and Opportunities
LibreOffice's call to switch to Linux is timely given the Windows 10 EOL, but it's important to acknowledge that migration is not without its challenges. Users accustomed to the Windows environment may face a learning curve with a new operating system, different file structures, and unfamiliar software installation methods. Compatibility with specific hardware drivers or proprietary Windows-only applications can also be hurdles.
However, the opportunities are significant. Linux offers a high degree of customization, often better performance on older hardware compared to newer Windows versions, enhanced security due to its architecture and the rapid patching cycle of open-source communities, and freedom from vendor lock-in. Paired with LibreOffice, users gain a powerful, free, and open-source productivity suite that can handle most common document tasks and offers excellent compatibility with Microsoft Office formats, facilitating collaboration with users who remain on Microsoft's platform.
For users concerned about the transition, many Linux distributions offer live environments that can be run from a USB drive without installing anything, allowing users to test compatibility and get a feel for the OS before committing. Resources like online forums, wikis, and communities dedicated to specific Linux distributions and LibreOffice provide ample support for newcomers.
The Broader Context: FOSS and Digital Sovereignty
The move by LibreOffice also touches upon the broader themes of digital sovereignty and the importance of open standards. By advocating for Linux and LibreOffice, The Document Foundation is promoting an ecosystem where users have more control over their computing environment and their data. Using open standards like ODF ensures that documents created today will be accessible in the future, regardless of the specific software used, reducing the risk of vendor lock-in and format obsolescence.
Governments and public institutions in various countries have explored or implemented migrations to FOSS, including Linux and LibreOffice, often citing cost savings, security, and digital sovereignty as key drivers. While these large-scale migrations can be complex, they underscore the viability and strategic importance of open-source alternatives.
What This Means for Users
For users currently running LibreOffice on Windows 7, 8, or 8.1, the upcoming 25.8 release means they will need to either stick with an older, stable version of LibreOffice (like 24.8.x) which will continue to receive updates for a period, or upgrade their operating system. Given the security risks associated with unsupported Windows versions, upgrading the OS is the strongly recommended path.
This presents a clear choice: upgrade to a supported Windows version (like Windows 10 LTSC, as suggested in the source article, or Windows 11 if hardware allows) or consider migrating to Linux. The Document Foundation is clearly hoping many will choose the latter, leveraging the need for an OS upgrade as an opportunity to embrace the FOSS ecosystem fully.
For users on 32-bit Windows, the deprecation means that while LibreOffice 25.8 might still offer a 32-bit build, its future is uncertain. This group of users, often on older hardware, might find Linux a particularly appealing alternative, as many lightweight Linux distributions are well-suited for less powerful machines and continue to offer robust 32-bit support where needed, or provide a path to a modern 64-bit OS if the hardware supports it.
Looking Ahead
LibreOffice's decision is a pragmatic step for the project, allowing developers to focus on modern platforms and features. It's also a strategic move, aligning the project more closely with the broader FOSS movement's push for Linux adoption as proprietary operating systems reach their end of life.
The success of this call to action will depend on various factors, including the perceived ease of migration, the availability of necessary applications on Linux, and the willingness of users to step outside their comfort zones. However, with Windows 10's EOL on the horizon and the increasing appeal of free and open-source alternatives, the timing is ripe for such a message.
LibreOffice remains a cornerstone of the FOSS desktop ecosystem. By shedding compatibility with outdated systems, it positions itself to be a more modern, secure, and feature-rich alternative for users who choose to make the leap to Linux or other supported platforms. The message is clear: as old Windows fades, a world of open possibilities on Linux, powered by LibreOffice, awaits.
Key Takeaways:
- LibreOffice 25.8 will drop support for Windows 7, 8, and 8.1.
- 32-bit Windows support is being deprecated.
- The move is linked to the upcoming Windows 10 End of Life and encourages migration to Linux.
- LibreOffice is a robust, free, and open-source alternative to Microsoft Office.
- Users on older Windows versions must upgrade their OS or switch to a supported LibreOffice version.
- Migration to Linux offers benefits like cost savings, security, and freedom from vendor lock-in.
The transition away from legacy systems is inevitable. LibreOffice's decision serves as both a technical update and a philosophical statement, reinforcing the value proposition of free and open-source software in an era of shifting platform allegiances.
External Resources: