The Mysterious Inner Workings of Io, Jupiter’s Volcanic Moon

The original version of this story appeared in Quanta Magazine.

For decades, Jupiter's moon Io has captivated scientists with its fiery, ever-changing surface. A world painted in vibrant oranges, reds, and yellows by sulfurous volcanic deposits, Io stands out as the most volcanically active body in our solar system. Its dramatic plumes, some reaching hundreds of kilometers into space, were first observed by NASA's Voyager 1 spacecraft in 1979, confirming a remarkable prediction made just days earlier based on theoretical calculations of tidal forces.

Scott Bolton, now based at the Southwest Research Institute in Texas and the lead investigator for NASA's Juno mission, recalls his first encounter with Io's dramatic landscape in the summer of 1980. Fresh out of college and working at NASA, he witnessed the initial images from Voyager 1. "They looked amazingly beautiful," Bolton said. "It was like an artist drew it. I was amazed at how exotic it looked compared to our moon."

This intense geological activity is powered not by internal radioactive decay like Earth's volcanism, but by a unique mechanism known as tidal heating. Io is locked in a gravitational dance with Jupiter and its neighboring moons, Europa and Ganymede. This orbital resonance forces Io into a slightly elliptical orbit around the gas giant. As Io swings closer to and farther from Jupiter, the immense gravitational pull varies, causing the moon to be constantly squeezed and stretched. This relentless kneading generates tremendous frictional heat within Io's interior, melting rock into magma that then erupts onto the surface.

The discovery of Io's volcanism and the subsequent understanding of tidal heating marked a pivotal moment in planetary science. It demonstrated that even small, seemingly geologically 'dead' worlds could harbor significant internal heat and activity if subjected to strong tidal forces. Io became the poster child for this powerful process, but the precise details of how this heating manifested within its interior remained a subject of intense debate.

The Reign of the Magma Ocean Theory

For many years, a leading theory proposed that the tidal heating generated within Io was so pervasive and intense that it created a global magma ocean situated just beneath the moon's rocky crust. This vast, contiguous layer of molten rock, perhaps 50 kilometers thick, was thought to be the source feeding Io's numerous volcanoes, explaining their widespread distribution across the moon's surface. The idea of a global subsurface ocean of liquid rock resonated with observations suggesting a uniform, omnipresent source of melt.

Support for this theory came, in part, from data gathered by NASA's Galileo spacecraft, which orbited Jupiter and studied its moons around the turn of the millennium. Galileo's magnetometer instrument detected a peculiar magnetic field emanating from Io. Scientists interpreted this signal as being generated by a large volume of electrically conductive fluid within the moon. After years of analysis, a study published in Science in 2011 concluded that this conductive layer was likely a global magma ocean.

This finding had broader implications. Galileo had also detected a similar magnetic field signal from Europa, another of Jupiter's large moons. In Europa's case, the signal was attributed to a vast ocean of salty liquid water beneath its icy shell. The parallel seemed clear: tidal heating, depending on the composition of the moon, could create either oceans of magma (on rocky Io) or oceans of liquid water (on icy Europa). The potential existence of a liquid water ocean on Europa, heated by tidal forces, fueled excitement about the possibility of habitable environments beyond Earth, leading to missions like NASA's Europa Clipper spacecraft, launched to investigate this very possibility.

Juno's Close Encounters and a Vanishing Ocean

Despite the widespread acceptance of the shallow magma ocean theory for Io, scientists like Scott Bolton and his team on the Juno mission sought to verify this picture with new, high-precision data. Juno, designed primarily to study Jupiter's deep interior and magnetic field, included flybys of Io in its extended mission plan, offering a unique opportunity to probe the moon's internal structure using a different technique: gravity science.

During close flybys in December 2023 and February 2024, Juno passed within a mere 1,500 kilometers of Io's surface. While stunning images of active volcanoes were captured, the primary scientific objective of these close passes was to measure Io's gravitational field with unprecedented accuracy. The principle behind gravity science is elegant: variations in a moon's internal mass distribution subtly affect the trajectory of a spacecraft flying nearby. These tiny accelerations or decelerations cause minute shifts in the frequency of the radio signals transmitted between the spacecraft and Earth, a phenomenon known as the Doppler effect.

By meticulously tracking these Doppler shifts, Bolton's team was able to build a detailed map of Io's gravitational field. This map, in turn, provides insights into how mass is distributed within the moon. If a large, global ocean of liquid rock existed just beneath the crust, its presence and the way it would respond to Jupiter's tidal forces (causing greater deformation or 'flexing' of the moon) would leave a distinct signature in the gravitational field. Ashley Davies, a volcanologist at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory not involved in the study, explained, "If there were indeed a global magma ocean, you’d see a lot more distortion as Io orbited around Jupiter and as the tidal forces flexed it and changed its shape."

However, the Juno gravity data did not show the expected level of distortion. The measurements were inconsistent with the presence of a vast, shallow, global magma ocean. The conclusion, as stated by Bolton, is clear: "There is no shallow ocean." Study coauthor Ryan Park, a Juno co-investigator at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, echoed this finding: "There cannot be a shallow magma ocean fueling the volcanoes."

Independent scientists have reviewed the results and found them robust. Katherine de Kleer, a planetary scientist at the California Institute of Technology, commented, "The results and the work are totally solid and pretty convincing."

Reconciling the Data: Gravity vs. Magnetism

The Juno findings present a puzzle when juxtaposed with the earlier Galileo magnetometer data that suggested a conductive layer consistent with a magma ocean. How can these seemingly contradictory results be reconciled? Researchers are now re-evaluating the interpretation of the Galileo data.

Francis Nimmo, a planetary scientist at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and a coauthor of the new Juno study, suggests that the magnetic signals from Galileo, while indicative of an electrically conductive region, might not have been definitive proof of a *fully molten* global ocean. "The magnetometer results," Nimmo said, "were taken as probably the best evidence for a magma ocean, but really they weren’t that strong." He explained that the induction data could potentially be explained by a region that is only *partially* molten, or perhaps a solid but highly conductive layer, rather than a vast, contiguous ocean of liquid rock. The distinction is crucial: a partially molten region would behave differently under tidal stress than a fully liquid ocean, potentially explaining the lack of gravitational distortion observed by Juno.

Jani Radebaugh, a planetary geologist at Brigham Young University, acknowledges the challenge: "People are not really disputing the magnetometer results, so you have to make that fit with everything else." The scientific community is now tasked with developing new models of Io's interior that can simultaneously explain both the magnetic signals detected by Galileo and the gravitational constraints provided by Juno.

If a shallow magma ocean is ruled out, what alternative structures could power Io's intense volcanism? One possibility is that the tidal heating is focused in specific regions or layers within the mantle, creating discrete, localized reservoirs of magma scattered throughout the crust and upper mantle, rather than a single global layer. This idea aligns with some earlier models of Io's interior before the magma ocean theory gained prominence. These magma chambers, perhaps interconnected in complex ways, could still feed the numerous volcanoes observed on the surface.

Another possibility is the existence of a deeper layer of melt. However, as Ryan Park points out, a very deep magma layer would need to be incredibly dense, potentially iron-rich, due to the immense pressure at that depth. Such dense magma would struggle to rise through the overlying solid rock to reach the surface and fuel eruptions. Furthermore, at significant depths, it becomes difficult to distinguish between a deep magma ocean and a liquid core. The Juno data doesn't definitively rule out melt at greater depths, but it strongly constrains the possibility of a *shallow, global* ocean.

Implications for Tidal Heating and Other Worlds

Io's extreme volcanism makes it a natural laboratory for studying tidal heating, the process believed to be active on many other moons and potentially exoplanets. The finding that Io lacks a shallow magma ocean prompts a re-evaluation of how tidal energy is dissipated and how it leads to melting within a rocky body. If tidal heating doesn't necessarily produce global magma oceans on rocky moons, what does this mean for icy moons like Europa, where tidal heating is thought to sustain vast subsurface liquid water oceans?

Scientists remain confident that tidal heating can indeed create and maintain liquid water oceans on icy worlds. The case of Saturn's moon Enceladus provides strong evidence; the Cassini spacecraft detected and even sampled plumes of water erupting from its South Pole, confirming the presence of a subsurface ocean. While there is some skepticism about the specifics of Europa's ocean, the majority of scientists believe it exists.

Robert Pappalardo, the Europa Clipper mission's project scientist at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, notes that Europa's magnetic signal detected by Galileo is considered "pretty clean." Europa's greater distance from Jupiter and its intense radiation belt compared to Io means that its own induced magnetic field signal, indicative of a conductive layer (like a salty ocean), stands out more clearly.

Why might tidal heating create water oceans but not necessarily magma oceans? Francis Nimmo highlights a fundamental difference between liquid water and liquid rock. "There’s a fundamental difference between a liquid-water ocean and a magma ocean," Nimmo explained. "The magma wants to escape; the water really doesn’t." Liquid rock (magma) is generally less dense than the solid rock from which it melts, causing it to be buoyant and rise towards the surface, leading to eruptions. The new study suggests that on Io, this magma might migrate and erupt relatively quickly, preventing the formation of a massive, stable, global layer just beneath the crust.

Liquid water, however, behaves differently. Unlike most substances, solid ice is less dense than liquid water. This means that liquid water, when formed beneath an icy shell, is denser than the surrounding ice and tends to collect at the lowest point, forming a stable ocean. "Liquid water is heavy, so it collects into an ocean," said Mike Sori, a planetary geophysicist at Purdue University.

This distinction is a key takeaway from the Juno results on Io. Tidal heating is an incredibly powerful heat source, capable of melting vast quantities of material. But the *form* that melted material takes – a rising, erupting magma on a rocky world versus a pooling, stable ocean on an icy world – depends critically on the physical properties of the materials involved. This suggests that the conditions for forming subsurface liquid water oceans, potentially habitable environments, might be more favorable on icy moons than the conditions for forming global magma oceans on rocky moons, despite both being powered by the same tidal mechanism.

Io and Our Own Moon: Unraveling Tidal Histories

The mysteries of Io's interior also shed light on the geological history of other worlds, including our own moon. While the Earth's moon is geologically quiet today, evidence suggests it experienced a period of significant volcanism billions of years ago, long after its initial formation from a giant impact event. Lunar crystals dating back 4.51 billion years formed from the initial molten debris. However, a significant number of younger crystals, around 4.35 billion years old, indicate a second phase of melting and volcanism.

Where did this later magma come from? One hypothesis, explored by Nimmo and colleagues in a paper published in Nature in December, proposes that tidal heating played a role. Early in its history, the moon was much closer to Earth. The gravitational interactions between the Earth, the moon, and the sun were complex. At a certain point, when the gravitational influences of Earth and the sun were roughly balanced, the moon's orbit might have become temporarily more elliptical. This increased eccentricity would have subjected the moon to tidal forces from Earth, similar to those acting on Io today, albeit less intense. This tidal kneading could have remelted portions of the moon's interior, triggering the secondary phase of volcanism.

Just as with Io, understanding precisely *where* within the moon this tidal heating was concentrated and *how* it led to melting remains an open question. By studying Io, the most extreme example of tidal heating in action, scientists hope to gain insights that can be applied to understanding the tidal histories and interior structures of other worlds, including the ancient history of our own moon and the potential for present-day oceans on icy satellites.

The Enduring Mystery of Io

The Juno mission's findings have significantly advanced our understanding of Io's interior, definitively ruling out a shallow global magma ocean. However, they have also reopened fundamental questions about how tidal heating operates within a rocky body. If the heat isn't accumulating in a vast subsurface ocean, where is it being generated and how does the magma make its way to the surface?

Scientists are now exploring models where tidal energy dissipation is concentrated in specific layers or regions within Io's mantle, leading to localized melting and the formation of interconnected magma pathways or discrete chambers. The distribution of volcanoes on Io's surface, while seemingly widespread, might still be consistent with such a structure, with magma migrating efficiently from these deeper or localized sources.

The challenge lies in precisely mapping these internal structures and understanding the rheology (how it deforms and flows) of Io's rocky mantle under intense tidal stress and high temperatures. Future observations, perhaps from upcoming missions or further analysis of existing data, will be needed to refine these models.

Io, with its relentless volcanic fury, remains a critical object of study for understanding the fundamental processes that shape rocky and icy worlds throughout the cosmos. Its extreme environment pushes the boundaries of our geological models and provides a unique test case for theories of internal heating and dynamics. As Ashley Davies aptly put it, "Io’s a complicated beast. The more we observe it, the more sophisticated the data and the analyses, the more puzzling it becomes."

The journey to understand Io's mysterious inner workings is far from over. Each new piece of data, like that provided by Juno's close flybys, peels back a layer of complexity, revealing how much more there is to learn about this extraordinary moon and the powerful forces that drive geological activity on worlds beyond our own.

The implications of Io's non-ocean interior extend beyond just this one moon. Understanding precisely how tidal energy is converted into heat and melt within Io's rocky interior provides crucial data points for modeling tidal heating on other rocky bodies, both within our solar system and around other stars. It helps planetary scientists refine their understanding of the conditions under which internal melting occurs and how that melt behaves.

Furthermore, the comparison between Io and Europa underscores the importance of material properties in determining the outcome of tidal heating. While rocky material might resist forming a stable global ocean near the surface due to magma buoyancy and eruption, icy material readily allows liquid water to pool into deep oceans due to the density difference between ice and water. This distinction is vital for assessing the potential habitability of icy moons, reinforcing the idea that these worlds are prime candidates in the search for life beyond Earth.

The Juno mission, by providing this new gravitational perspective on Io, has not diminished the moon's scientific importance; rather, it has highlighted the complexity and nuance of planetary interiors and the processes that drive their evolution. Io remains Hell's poster child, a world of extreme volcanism, but the source of that fire is now understood to be more intricate than a simple shallow ocean. The ongoing effort to decipher its secrets promises to yield deeper insights into the fundamental forces shaping worlds across the cosmos.

The Path Forward: New Questions and Future Exploration

The refutation of the shallow magma ocean theory for Io opens up several key questions for future research:

• **Where is the tidal heating concentrated?** Is it primarily in the deep mantle, the upper mantle, or distributed throughout?
• **How does magma migrate to the surface?** If there isn't a global ocean, are there extensive networks of dikes and sills, or discrete magma chambers that feed the volcanoes?
• **How can the Galileo magnetic data be fully explained?** What conductive structure, other than a global magma ocean, is consistent with both the magnetic and gravitational data?
• **What does this imply for tidal heating models in general?** Do current models accurately predict where heat is generated and how melt is distributed in rocky bodies?

Answering these questions will require a combination of further theoretical modeling and potentially new observational data. While Juno's dedicated Io flybys are complete, future missions to the Jupiter system, such as the European Space Agency's JUICE (Jupiter Icy Moons Explorer) mission and NASA's Europa Clipper, may provide additional data that can indirectly shed light on Io's interior or refine our understanding of tidal processes in the Jovian system.

The scientific process is one of continuous refinement. Theories are proposed, tested with data, and revised or replaced when new evidence emerges. The story of Io's interior, from the initial prediction of volcanism to the Galileo-era magma ocean theory and now the Juno-era re-evaluation, is a compelling example of this process in action. It underscores the value of returning to previously studied worlds with new instruments and perspectives.

Ultimately, understanding Io is not just about one moon; it's about understanding a fundamental geological process that is likely widespread throughout the universe. Tidal heating plays a role in the dynamics of binary star systems, the evolution of exoplanets orbiting close to their stars, and the potential habitability of icy moons far from the sun. Io, in all its fiery complexity, remains a vital key to unlocking these broader cosmic mysteries.

The scientific community will continue to pore over the Juno data, combine it with previous observations, and develop new models to explain the enigmatic interior of this volcanic world. The absence of a shallow magma ocean, once thought to be a certainty, reminds us that even for the most intensely studied objects, the universe still holds surprises, pushing us to ask deeper questions and seek out new ways to explore.

The quest to understand Io's internal engine is a testament to human curiosity and our drive to map the hidden landscapes of distant worlds. Each eruption, each wobble detected by a passing spacecraft, adds another piece to the puzzle, bringing us closer to a complete picture of this extraordinary moon and the powerful forces that shape it.

---

Original story reprinted with permission from Quanta Magazine, an editorially independent publication of the Simons Foundation whose mission is to enhance public understanding of science by covering research developments and trends in mathematics and the physical and life sciences.