Stay Updated Icon

Subscribe to Our Tech & Career Digest

Join thousands of readers getting the latest insights on tech trends, career tips, and exclusive updates delivered straight to their inbox.

We Bought a 'Peeing' Robot Attack Dog From Temu. It Was Even Weirder Than Expected

1:37 PM   |   01 June 2025

We Bought a 'Peeing' Robot Attack Dog From Temu. It Was Even Weirder Than Expected

The Bizarre World of Ultra-Cheap Tech: A Temu Robot Dog Adventure

In my 15 years of reviewing technology, I've encountered my fair share of strange gadgets. From questionable smart home devices to niche wearables, the tech landscape is vast and often peculiar. Yet, nothing could have prepared me for the experience of testing a pellet-firing, story-telling, pretend-urinating robot attack dog purchased from the depths of the internet marketplace, Temu. This wasn't just another review; it was a journey into the unexpected, a testament to the old adage that you get what you pay for, and sometimes, you get something far weirder.

The siren song came, as it often does these days, via an Instagram ad. A promise of animatronic wizardry, a robotic companion capable of complex maneuvers and even, apparently, offensive capabilities, all for less than the price of a round of drinks in a major city. The platform was Temu, known for its incredibly low prices and direct-from-manufacturer shipping, often resulting in products that defy conventional quality expectations. Having previously explored the world of gadgets served up by Instagram algorithms, the temptation was irresistible. The package arrived in a slightly battered box, a common hallmark of international budget shipping, but the words “FIRE BULLETS PET” emblazoned on the side immediately confirmed that this was no ordinary robotic companion.

Peering through the protective plastic window, I saw it: a plasticized quadruped, clearly designed to evoke the image of the sophisticated, and sometimes unsettling, robotic canines developed by companies like Boston Dynamics. Boston Dynamics has been at the forefront of robotics innovation for years, creating machines capable of dynamic movement and complex tasks. This Temu counterpart, however, promised a different kind of experience. My four-and-a-half-year-old son, witnessing the unboxing, immediately christened the robot “Clippy,” a name as inexplicable as some of the robot's features would turn out to be. For a mere $50 (or slightly less if you opted out of the spinal-mounted pellet gun), Clippy was ours.

First Impressions: Plastic Dreams and Dubious Durability

Freeing Clippy from his cardboard confines revealed a creature constructed from some of the lightest, cheapest, and glossiest plastic I had ever encountered. While plastic can be a fantastic material, offering durability and lightness, as seen in the robust polycarbonate body of the Nokia Lumia 920, Clippy's plastic felt more akin to something you'd find in a Christmas cracker toy – flimsy and lacking any real sense of substance or longevity.

The main body, housing the robot's electronics, possessed a modest weight, but the four spindly legs seemed ill-equipped to support even this. This was particularly concerning given that I had the model featuring a turret designed to launch water-absorbent pellets. The overall aesthetic was a peculiar blend of menacing and comical, resembling an elongated CCTV camera perched on legs with a weaponized hump. Visually, it was a budget interpretation of a Boston Dynamics machine, capturing the form but none of the implied function or build quality.

Image may contain Robot Hardwood Wood Floor Flooring Banana Food Fruit Plant Produce Clothing Footwear and Shoe
Courtesy of Esat Dedezade

The accompanying remote control was equally perplexing. Heavily inspired by the ergonomic shape of an Xbox controller, it felt hollow and airy, as if filled with helium. Its most charming feature was undoubtedly the molded plastic bumper buttons and triggers – entirely non-functional, a beautiful monument to uselessness. The face of the controller was a chaotic jumble of buttons, seemingly placed without any logical order, a true challenge to muscle memory and intuitive control. With no instructions provided, deciphering its functions would be an adventure in itself.

Bringing Clippy to Life (and Sound)

Initial attempts to power on Clippy were met with silence. The on/off switch was unresponsive, and plugging in the USB-C charging cable yielded no indicator light. A quick investigation into the battery compartment revealed the issue: the battery was disconnected. Whether this was a safety precaution for shipping or simply a manufacturing oversight was unclear, but reconnecting it brought Clippy to life. And oh, what life it was.

The moment Clippy powered on, a soundscape of piercing, shrill noises erupted from its built-in speakers. It was immediately apparent that subtlety was not in Clippy's repertoire. A frantic search of the bewildering array of buttons on the controller for a volume or mute option proved futile. There was none. Clippy existed only at maximum volume.

Naturally, the first button I gravitated towards was labeled “urinate.” Anticipating a simple leg lift, I was instead greeted by cheerful whistling followed by the distinct sound of water tinkling into a toilet bowl. It was an unexpectedly specific and bizarre audio choice, adding another layer to Clippy's already strange persona.

Next, my eyes landed on the “handstand” button. This felt like a proper test of robotic capability. A true handstand requires sophisticated balance, coordination of multiple motors, and real-time sensor data processing – the kind of impressive feat seen in advanced robotics. I pressed the button, expecting a display of mechanical grace. Instead, Clippy violently faceplanted with a loud thud that made me wince. For a moment, I feared I had broken him before the review had even properly begun. Then, his rear legs twitched upwards, a jerky, almost seizure-like motion that I interpreted as a highly abstract representation of elegant scissor kicks. It was like watching an ant communicate with its antennae – a silent, desperate plea of “Don't blame me, bro, what did you expect?” Miraculously, Clippy righted himself, seemingly unharmed, ready for more indignity. I, however, was less confident.

A Multitude of Motions (and Music)

The controller boasted an impressive 17 functions, a testament to the designers' ambition, if not their organizational skills. While detailing every single one would be exhaustive, here's a rundown of some of Clippy's more notable, and often baffling, talents:

  • Kung fu: Despite the name, this function involved absolutely no martial arts whatsoever. No high kicks, no chops, not even a clumsy tumble. Instead, Clippy would launch into a routine accompanied by what can only be described as poolside, Lost Frequencies-esque lounge music. Clippy's interpretation of “dancing” ensued.
  • Swimming/Dance: These two buttons triggered movements that surpassed even the most energetic performances I've witnessed. Clippy engaged in vigorous, floor-humping motions that were both mesmerizing and slightly disturbing. A crucial side note for anyone considering a purchase: Clippy is emphatically *not* waterproof. Do not introduce him to water, despite the “swimming” label.
  • Push-up: This function was perhaps the most straightforward, if still absurd. Clippy would perform push-up motions while, inexplicably, the guitar riff from Survivor's “Eye of the Tiger” blared from his speakers. No further notes are necessary for this particular masterpiece of programming.
  • Story: Prepare yourself for an auditory assault. Pressing this button unleashed incredibly loud, tinny classical music overlaid with a spoken story. The narrator possessed a voice reminiscent of Eric Cartman, and the poor speaker quality made comprehension a significant challenge. The first story I managed to partially decipher involved an old woman and her aging, toothless cat who couldn't catch mice. The cat delivered a moral about respecting elders for their past contributions. The next story seemed to involve an injured pigeon. The narrative content was as bizarre and disjointed as the robot's movements.

Control Issues and App Adventures

Despite this clearly incredible and diverse skillset, Clippy's fundamental ability to be controlled via the remote was, to put it mildly, flawed. Moving forward was generally achievable, but the left and right turn buttons resulted in agonizingly slow pivots, often culminating in Clippy toppling over. Reverse motion was simply not an option, requiring constant manual intervention to prevent collisions with walls and furniture – collision detection cameras were, predictably, absent. One of the few commands that worked reliably was the “hadn-shake” (as labeled on the remote), where Clippy would lift a paw, like any well-trained, albeit plastic, pup.

Image may contain Electronics and Remote Control
Courtesy of Esat Dedezade

Beyond the physical remote, there was also an official app promising Bluetooth control. After navigating the initial language barrier (the app defaulted to Chinese), switching to English was possible, making navigation easier. The app even offered bonus features not found on the remote, such as selecting different “foods” for Clippy to “eat.” These ranged from a simple bone to the alarming “Nuclear Energy Source,” each triggering various eating animations. There was also a voice command mode, which, despite granting all requested permissions (including, against my better judgment, access to my phone and files), seemed entirely non-functional. Clippy remained deaf to my spoken commands. A program mode allowed for setting up custom actions, but every attempt I made seemed to end, inevitably, in another faceplant.

The "Attack" Feature: A Munitions Report

The product page description for Clippy's back-mounted turret was particularly enticing: “can be loaded with water bombs to launch for fun.” The accompanying image depicted impressive blue projectiles blasting forth, conjuring visions of an autonomous robotic guard dog patrolling my home, dispensing justice upon perceived threats. The reality, however, was significantly less dramatic.

The package contained a tiny bag of minuscule blue balls, perhaps a millimeter in diameter. These were the “water bombs.” After soaking them in water for a few hours, they plumped up into gel-like pellets. Loading them into the turret involved guessing the correct slot (again, no instructions). With the turret presumably loaded, I instructed my son to stand back, wary of potential ricochets, and pressed the “attack” button on the controller.

Clippy responded by walking forward a few steps, crouching slightly as if bracing for recoil, and then... two pellets dribbled out of the barrel with all the force and urgency of a clogged ketchup bottle. This underwhelming performance was repeated about ten times. At its absolute best, a pellet might travel relatively straight, but it lacked any meaningful velocity or force. We even attempted a penetration test on a wet square of toilet paper – the pellets simply bounced off. The “attack dog” marketing felt like a cruel joke after witnessing the reality of its munitions capabilities.

Beyond the Absurdity: Value and Reflection

Given the litany of flaws, the cheap construction, the bizarre features, and the utterly ineffective “attack” function, the question arises: should anyone actually buy this thing, even at its low price point? Objectively, the answer is likely no, at least not if you expect a functional, sophisticated robot. It fails spectacularly at most of its advertised capabilities, and its quality is dubious at best.

Yet, despite how easy it is to critique Clippy from a technical standpoint, playing around with this ridiculous robot unexpectedly transported me back to my childhood. Back then, toys like this, with their simple mechanics and often exaggerated promises, felt like gateways to other worlds. They weren't perfect, but they sparked imagination and provided endless entertainment through their very imperfections.

And that's where Clippy finds his unexpected redemption. For the week we spent testing him, he became a source of daily entertainment for my son. Every morning, Clippy was brought into our bedroom, waking me not with a gentle nudge, but with a shrill, unintelligible story followed by the jarring guitar riff of “Eye of the Tiger.” While this particular wake-up call is already wearing thin, the simple joy Clippy brought to a four-year-old was undeniable. He wasn't a sophisticated piece of engineering; he was a character, a source of laughter and bewildered fascination.

Inevitably, the novelty will fade. Clippy will likely join the ranks of forgotten toys, gathering dust in a corner, eventually destined for a thrift store. There, he will await a new family, ready to dazzle and confuse them in equal measure with his bizarre repertoire of sounds and motions. And I can only hope, for their sake, that they have a high tolerance for loud, tinny classical music and the enduring power of Survivor.