X Grapples with Persistent Bugs and Outages Following Data Center Issues
The social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, has been experiencing significant technical difficulties for over 24 hours, leaving many users frustrated by persistent bugs and disruptions to basic functionality. Issues reported by users, including this reporter, range from direct messages failing to load and timelines not updating to the inability to view certain posts without repeatedly refreshing the webpage.
According to Downdetector, a service that tracks web outages based on user reports, the problems began escalating on Thursday afternoon. Thousands of users submitted reports detailing a variety of bugs, from difficulties signing in to disappearing direct messages, starting around 2:12 p.m. Eastern time.
X's official Engineering account on the platform acknowledged the degraded service on Thursday, attributing the issues to a data center outage. In a post, the account stated, “X is aware some of our users are experiencing performance issues on the platform today. We are experiencing a data center outage and the team is actively working to remediate the issue.”
Adding a potential layer of complexity to the situation, Wired reported that a fire occurred on Thursday at a data center near Portland, Oregon, which is reportedly leased by X. While the timing aligns with the onset of the widespread issues, it remains unclear whether this specific fire is directly related to the ongoing outages and performance problems affecting the platform.
A Pattern of Instability: Recent History of X Outages
This latest incident is not an isolated event but rather the most recent in a series of technical disruptions that have affected X since its acquisition by Elon Musk in late 2022. The platform has faced increasing scrutiny regarding its stability and reliability, particularly in the wake of significant operational and personnel changes.
The last major service disruption X suffered was in March 2025, when users worldwide were abruptly disconnected from the social network. This outage prevented users from accessing their feeds, sending messages, and engaging with content. At the time, Elon Musk, without providing evidence, attributed the disruption to a cyberattack.
Prior to the March incident, X experienced large-scale connectivity issues in December 2022, shortly after Musk took over, and again in July 2023. More recently, in May 2025, X timelines briefly stopped updating for many users, a problem similar to some of the bugs reported in the current outage.
These recurring issues paint a picture of a platform struggling to maintain consistent performance, raising questions about the underlying causes and the company's capacity to address them effectively.
The Human Factor: Layoffs and Engineering Capacity
A significant factor often cited in discussions about X's technical stability is the dramatic reduction in its workforce following Elon Musk's acquisition. After purchasing the company for $44 billion in October 2022, Musk swiftly implemented widespread layoffs, reducing the employee count by approximately 80%. The workforce shrank from around 7,500 employees to roughly 1,300 workers.
The engineering department, crucial for maintaining and developing the platform's complex infrastructure, was particularly hard hit. According to CNBC, as of January 2023, X had only about 550 full-time engineers. A new wave of layoffs in November 2024 further impacted the engineering team, exacerbating concerns about the company's technical capacity.
Maintaining a global social media platform serving hundreds of millions of users requires a substantial and skilled engineering team. These teams are responsible for everything from managing vast data centers and network infrastructure to developing software, implementing security measures, and responding to incidents like outages or cyberattacks. The significant reduction in personnel, especially experienced engineers familiar with the platform's intricate systems, could potentially strain the remaining team's ability to proactively prevent issues, quickly diagnose problems, and implement timely fixes during crises.
The complexity of X's infrastructure means that even seemingly minor bugs can cascade into widespread disruptions if not addressed swiftly and effectively. A smaller team might face challenges in managing the workload, maintaining legacy systems, and innovating while simultaneously responding to emergencies.
Infrastructure Challenges: Data Centers and Security
The recent acknowledgement of a data center outage highlights the critical role of physical infrastructure in keeping a platform like X running. Data centers are the backbone of the internet, housing the servers, storage systems, and networking equipment necessary to process and deliver data to users worldwide. Maintaining these facilities requires constant monitoring, maintenance, and investment.
Reports of a fire at an X-leased data center, while not definitively linked to the current outage, underscore the potential vulnerabilities of physical infrastructure. Events like fires, power outages, or natural disasters can severely impact service availability if proper redundancies and disaster recovery protocols are not in place or are compromised.
Furthermore, the article mentions that since Musk's purchase, X has reportedly made security snafus, including improperly configuring servers that might have left the site vulnerable to denial of service attacks. Security and infrastructure stability are intrinsically linked. Misconfigured servers or inadequate security practices can not only expose user data but also create vulnerabilities that malicious actors can exploit to disrupt services, potentially leading to outages.
The combination of reduced engineering staff and potential infrastructure or security misconfigurations creates a challenging environment for maintaining a stable and reliable platform at the scale of X. Each component, from the physical data centers to the software running on the servers and the engineers managing it all, must function seamlessly. Weaknesses in any area can have ripple effects across the entire system.
User Experience and Platform Reliability
For users, recurring outages and persistent bugs erode trust and disrupt their ability to use the platform for communication, information dissemination, and business. Businesses and content creators who rely on X to reach their audiences are particularly affected by downtime, which can impact their visibility and engagement.
The narrative tone of user reports on platforms like Downdetector and even X itself during an outage often reflects frustration and confusion. Users are left wondering why basic functions aren't working and when service will be restored. The lack of clear, timely communication during these events can further exacerbate user dissatisfaction.
Platform reliability is not just a technical issue; it's a fundamental aspect of the user experience and the platform's value proposition. In a competitive social media landscape, users have alternatives, and frequent disruptions can drive them to other platforms that offer greater stability.
The Broader Context: Cost-Cutting and Technical Debt
The extensive layoffs at X were part of a broader effort by Elon Musk to reduce costs and streamline operations. While cost-cutting is a common business practice, particularly after an acquisition, drastic reductions in critical technical teams can have unintended consequences for long-term stability and maintenance.
Maintaining complex software and infrastructure often involves managing 'technical debt' – the implied cost of future rework required when choosing an easy solution now instead of using a better approach that would take longer. A well-staffed engineering team is necessary to address technical debt, refactor code, upgrade systems, and perform preventative maintenance. A reduced team might be forced to prioritize immediate fixes over long-term stability, potentially accumulating more technical debt and increasing the likelihood of future issues.
Data center operations themselves involve significant costs, including power, cooling, maintenance, and staffing. Decisions related to infrastructure investment and management can directly impact reliability. While specific details about X's infrastructure spending post-acquisition are not publicly available in detail, the acknowledgement of a data center outage suggests that these physical facilities remain critical points of failure.
Responding to Incidents: Diagnosis and Remediation
When an outage occurs, the ability of the engineering team to quickly diagnose the root cause and implement a fix is paramount. This requires experienced personnel, robust monitoring systems, and well-defined incident response protocols. The speed and effectiveness of this response can significantly mitigate the impact and duration of an outage.
The X Engineering account's acknowledgement of a data center outage indicates that the team identified a potential cause relatively quickly. However, the persistence of bugs and performance issues for over 24 hours suggests that the remediation process is complex, or the initial issue may have triggered secondary problems within the system.
Incident response in large-scale systems is a highly specialized skill. It involves isolating the problem, understanding its scope, developing and testing solutions, and deploying them without causing further disruption. A smaller or less experienced team might face challenges in coordinating this effort effectively, especially under pressure.
Looking Ahead: The Future of X's Stability
The recurring technical issues on X raise ongoing questions about the platform's future stability. While all large online services experience occasional glitches and outages, the frequency and nature of the problems reported on X since the acquisition have led many observers to connect them to the significant changes implemented under new ownership.
Maintaining a platform of X's size and complexity requires continuous investment in infrastructure, talent, and processes. The balance between cost-efficiency and technical resilience is a delicate one. As X continues to evolve under Elon Musk's leadership, its ability to ensure a stable and reliable user experience will be a key factor in retaining its user base and achieving its business objectives.
The current situation, with persistent bugs following a reported data center issue, serves as another reminder of the intricate technical challenges involved in running a global social media platform and the potential consequences when that complex machinery encounters disruptions.
External Perspectives and Analysis
Technology news outlets have closely followed the technical trajectory of X since the acquisition. Reports from publications like TechCrunch, Wired, The Verge, and CNBC have documented the layoffs, the changes in technical direction, and the subsequent periods of instability.
For instance, TechCrunch has previously reported on major service disruptions on X, including the widespread outage in March 2025. These reports often detail the user impact and the company's official statements, providing a timeline of events.
Wired's coverage, such as the article mentioning the potential data center fire near Portland, delves into specific infrastructure incidents that could be linked to platform performance issues. Such reporting often relies on sources familiar with the company's operations or publicly available information like fire department logs.
The Verge has also documented the changes within X, including further layoffs impacting the engineering department in late 2024. These reports often highlight the concerns raised by former employees and industry experts about the long-term effects of such workforce reductions on the platform's technical health.
CNBC's reporting has provided insights into the scale of the engineering team reduction, noting that X had only 550 full-time engineers as of early 2023. This context is crucial for understanding the capacity constraints the company might face in managing a complex global service.
Reuters has also covered the outages, including Musk's claims about cyberattacks, providing a broader news perspective on the events.
These external reports collectively contribute to a public understanding of the challenges X faces and provide context for interpreting the causes and implications of recurring technical problems.

The Technical Underpinnings: Data Centers and Network Architecture
To appreciate the impact of data center issues and engineering capacity, it's helpful to understand the basic technical architecture of a platform like X. X operates a distributed system, meaning its services are spread across multiple data centers located in different geographic regions. This distribution is essential for several reasons:
- **Latency Reduction:** Placing data centers closer to users reduces the time it takes for data to travel, making the platform feel faster and more responsive.
- **Redundancy and Disaster Recovery:** If one data center experiences an issue (like a fire or power outage), traffic can ideally be rerouted to other data centers, preventing a complete service collapse.
- **Load Balancing:** Distributing the user load across multiple facilities prevents any single data center from becoming overwhelmed.
Within each data center, thousands of servers work together to handle various tasks: storing tweets, processing likes and retweets, delivering timelines, managing direct messages, running algorithms, and much more. These servers are connected by high-speed networks, and the data centers themselves are connected to the global internet backbone.
Maintaining this complex web of hardware and software requires constant attention. Servers need regular maintenance and upgrades. Network equipment must be monitored for performance issues. Software needs patching, updates, and bug fixes. Data must be backed up and replicated across different locations to prevent loss.
A data center outage, whether caused by power failure, network issues, hardware malfunction, or an external event like a fire, can disrupt service for users whose traffic is primarily routed through that facility. If redundancy systems are not fully functional or if the outage affects a critical core component, the impact can spread more widely.
The engineering team is responsible for designing, building, and maintaining this entire infrastructure. They write the software that runs the platform, manage the databases that store user data, configure the servers and networks, and build the automated systems that monitor performance and detect issues. A reduction in this team's size directly impacts the resources available to perform these critical tasks.
Security Implications of Infrastructure Management
The mention of potential security snafus, such as improperly configured servers, adds another layer of concern. Security is not just about protecting against external attacks; it's also about ensuring the integrity and availability of the system. Misconfigurations can inadvertently create vulnerabilities.
For example, improperly configured firewalls or network settings could potentially expose internal systems to the public internet or allow unauthorized access. This could make the platform more susceptible to denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, where attackers flood the service with traffic to make it unavailable to legitimate users. While Musk attributed the March outage to a cyberattack, security researchers cited by Engadget were skeptical, suggesting internal issues might have been the cause or a contributing factor, potentially related to server misconfigurations.
Ensuring robust security requires continuous auditing, patching, and monitoring. It also requires a deep understanding of the system's architecture and potential attack vectors. A reduced security or engineering team might struggle to keep up with these demands, potentially leaving the platform more vulnerable.
The User Experience: Beyond Just Downtime
While complete outages are the most visible sign of trouble, persistent bugs and performance issues, like those currently reported (messages not loading, timelines not updating), also significantly degrade the user experience. These issues can make the platform feel unreliable, slow, and frustrating to use.
For users who rely on X for real-time information or communication, delays in timeline updates or failures in message delivery can be particularly disruptive. The need to constantly refresh the page to see new content adds friction and makes the platform less efficient.
These smaller, persistent bugs can sometimes be more challenging to diagnose and fix than a complete outage, as they might affect only a subset of users or occur intermittently. They require dedicated engineering resources to investigate, reproduce, and resolve.
Conclusion: Navigating the Challenges
The ongoing technical issues on X, including the recent bugs following a data center outage, are complex and likely stem from a combination of factors. While data center problems can occur on any large online service, the context of significant workforce reductions, particularly in engineering, and previous reports of potential infrastructure and security issues cannot be ignored.
Maintaining a global platform like X requires a robust technical foundation and a skilled team dedicated to its upkeep and improvement. The challenges X faces in ensuring consistent stability highlight the critical importance of investing in infrastructure, retaining technical talent, and prioritizing operational resilience.
As X navigates these challenges, the user experience remains directly tied to the platform's technical health. Addressing the root causes of recurring outages and bugs will be essential for X to regain user trust and maintain its position as a major global communication platform.
The situation serves as a case study in the delicate balance required to run a massive online service – where cost-saving measures must be carefully weighed against the potential impact on the underlying technical infrastructure and the team responsible for keeping it operational.