Stay Updated Icon

Subscribe to Our Tech & Career Digest

Join thousands of readers getting the latest insights on tech trends, career tips, and exclusive updates delivered straight to their inbox.

MrBeast's Chichén Itzá Video Sparks Controversy and Legal Threats in Mexico

1:22 PM   |   20 May 2025

MrBeast's Chichén Itzá Video Sparks Controversy and Legal Threats in Mexico

MrBeast's Chichén Itzá Expedition: A Clash Between Digital Fame and Ancient Heritage

In an era dominated by digital content and the pursuit of viral moments, the world's most popular creators constantly seek novel and spectacular backdrops for their videos. For YouTube sensation Jimmy Donaldson, better known as MrBeast, this quest recently led him to the ancient Maya city of Chichén Itzá in Mexico. His video, titled “I Explored 2,000 Year Old Ancient Temples,” quickly garnered tens of millions of views, showcasing the awe-inspiring architecture of this UNESCO World Heritage site. However, the expedition was not without controversy, drawing sharp criticism and threats of legal action from Mexican authorities, igniting a broader conversation about responsible tourism, cultural preservation, and the impact of influencer culture on historical sites.

The video, posted online, depicted scenes that appeared to violate established regulations for visiting Chichén Itzá. Among the alleged transgressions were climbing on ancient structures – a practice strictly prohibited to protect the delicate stonework from erosion and damage – and potentially filming at night, which is also restricted. Furthermore, the video included a promotional segment for MrBeast's Feastables candy brand, raising questions about commercial filming permits and the appropriate use of a sacred historical site for marketing purposes. Mexico's culture secretary, Alejandra Frausto Guerrero, and the National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH), the governmental body responsible for the protection and administration of archaeological sites, were quick to condemn the video and announce they were weighing legal action against the production company involved.

Chichén Itzá: A Beacon of Maya Civilization

To understand the gravity of the situation, it is essential to appreciate the significance of Chichén Itzá. Located on the Yucatán Peninsula, this sprawling archaeological site was a major focal point of Maya civilization between 600 and 1200 AD. It served as a powerful economic and political center, showcasing advanced architectural, astronomical, and mathematical knowledge. Key structures like the Temple of Kukulcan (El Castillo), the Great Ball Court, the Observatory (El Caracol), and the Temple of the Warriors stand as enduring testaments to the ingenuity and complexity of the Maya people.

Chichén Itzá is not merely a collection of old buildings; it is a sacred space, a repository of history, and a vital link to the cultural identity of contemporary Maya communities and the Mexican nation. Its inclusion as a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1988 and its designation as one of the New7Wonders of the World underscore its global importance and the need for its careful preservation for future generations.

Rules and Regulations at Archaeological Sites

Managing millions of visitors annually while simultaneously protecting fragile ancient structures is a complex undertaking. INAH has established clear rules and regulations for visitors to archaeological sites across Mexico, including Chichén Itzá. These rules are designed to ensure the safety of visitors and, more importantly, the long-term conservation of the historical remains. Common regulations include:

  • Prohibition of climbing on pyramids and other structures.
  • Restrictions on touching or leaning against walls and carvings.
  • Designated pathways for visitors to follow.
  • Limitations on group sizes and guide requirements.
  • Restrictions on filming and photography, particularly for commercial purposes, which often require special permits and fees.
  • Specific operating hours, typically from morning until late afternoon, with night access usually limited to special, controlled light and sound shows.
  • Prohibition of bringing certain items, such as large bags, tripods (without permits), or drones (without permits).
  • Strict rules against removing any artifacts or stones from the site.

These rules are not arbitrary; they are based on conservation science and the need to mitigate the impact of human presence on structures that have survived for over a millennium. Foot traffic, touch, and even the oils from skin can contribute to the erosion and degradation of stone surfaces and intricate carvings. Climbing, in particular, puts immense stress on ancient steps and facades, accelerating their deterioration and posing a risk of collapse.

The Alleged Violations in the MrBeast Video

According to reports and descriptions of the video, several actions depicted appeared to contravene INAH regulations:

  • Climbing the Pyramid: The most prominent alleged violation was the depiction of climbing a pyramid structure. While the specific pyramid climbed was not always clearly identified in initial reports, climbing the main structures like El Castillo has been strictly forbidden for many years due to conservation concerns. The video's voiceover even highlighted the unusual nature of this access, stating, “Nobody gets to go where we’re going.”
  • Night Filming: The video reportedly included scenes filmed at the archaeological site after its standard closing hours. Accessing the site at night typically requires special permission, often granted only for specific research or official events, and is not part of general visitor access.
  • Commercial Promotion: The inclusion of a segment promoting MrBeast's Feastables candy brand within the video filmed at the site suggests commercial activity. Commercial filming at INAH sites requires specific permits, which involve fees and adherence to strict guidelines to ensure the activity does not harm the site or exploit its cultural significance inappropriately.

These actions, if confirmed to have occurred without the necessary permits and permissions from INAH, constitute violations of Mexican law pertaining to the protection of archaeological heritage. The law mandates that any activity, including filming and commercial use, must be authorized by INAH to ensure it aligns with conservation efforts and respects the cultural integrity of the site.

The Response from Mexican Authorities

The reaction from the Mexican government was swift and stern. Culture Secretary Alejandra Frausto Guerrero publicly stated that her agency was evaluating legal action against the production company responsible for the video. This response highlights the seriousness with which Mexico regards the protection of its cultural heritage and its willingness to enforce regulations, even against globally recognized figures.

INAH officials echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that access for filming, especially commercial projects, is subject to specific permits that outline the scope of work, areas accessible, and required fees. The fees collected from such permits are often reinvested in the conservation and maintenance of the sites. Filming without permission not only bypasses these regulations but also potentially allows activities that could be detrimental to the site's preservation.

The legal action being weighed would likely target the production company that facilitated the filming, as they would be responsible for obtaining the necessary permits and ensuring adherence to site rules. While MrBeast himself might not be the direct target of legal proceedings, his prominent involvement in the video and his status as the channel owner place him at the center of the controversy and raise questions about his team's due diligence in respecting local laws and cultural norms.

The Broader Context: Influencer Culture, Tourism, and Conservation

This incident is not isolated. It fits into a growing pattern of conflicts arising from the intersection of mass tourism, the demands of digital content creation, and the need to preserve fragile historical and natural sites. Influencers and content creators are constantly pressured to produce unique, attention-grabbing content, which can sometimes lead to pushing boundaries or disregarding rules designed for conservation and respect.

The pursuit of viral content can incentivize creators to seek out exclusive access or engage in activities that are prohibited for the general public. While some collaborations between creators and heritage sites can be beneficial for promoting tourism and awareness (when done responsibly and with permission), incidents like the one at Chichén Itzá highlight the potential for exploitation and damage when rules are ignored.

The controversy also underscores the challenges faced by heritage sites in managing visitor impact in the digital age. The sheer volume of visitors, coupled with the pervasive use of cameras and social media, means that any transgression, whether intentional or not, can be instantly broadcast to a global audience, potentially encouraging copycat behavior or normalizing disrespect for regulations.

Balancing Access and Preservation

Finding a balance between allowing public access to cultural heritage sites and ensuring their long-term preservation is a perpetual challenge. Sites like Chichén Itzá are vital for education, research, and cultural connection, but every visitor, every touch, and every step contributes to wear and tear. Regulations, though sometimes perceived as inconvenient by tourists, are the primary tools for managing this impact.

For content creators, this means recognizing that historical sites are not merely backdrops for entertainment or commercial gain. They are places of profound historical and cultural significance that demand respect. Responsible content creation at such sites involves:

  • Thoroughly researching and understanding the rules and regulations of the site.
  • Obtaining all necessary permits for filming, especially for commercial purposes or activities beyond standard visitor access.
  • Working closely with site authorities (like INAH) to ensure planned activities are permissible and do not endanger the site.
  • Educating their audience about the importance of conservation and respectful visitation.
  • Using their platform to promote responsible tourism practices.

MrBeast's massive reach – he commands one of the largest audiences on YouTube globally – means that his actions, whether intended as harmless exploration or not, carry significant weight and set an example for millions of viewers. The voiceover in the video, suggesting exclusive access (“Nobody gets to go where we’re going”), while intended to create intrigue, inadvertently highlighted the potential for privileged access that bypasses standard regulations, further fueling public and official concern.

The Legal Implications

Mexican law, specifically the Federal Law on Archaeological, Artistic, and Historical Monuments and Zones, provides the legal framework for protecting the nation's cultural heritage. INAH is the body empowered to enforce this law. Violations can result in administrative sanctions, including fines, and in more severe cases, criminal penalties. Filming without a permit, conducting commercial activities without authorization, and damaging or interfering with archaeological structures are all potential grounds for legal action.

The decision by the Mexican authorities to pursue legal action, even against a high-profile international figure's production team, sends a clear message that the rules governing access and activity at archaeological sites are serious and will be enforced. The specific legal strategy will depend on the exact nature of the violations identified and the evidence gathered by INAH investigators.

Moving Forward: A Call for Greater Awareness

The MrBeast Chichén Itzá controversy serves as a valuable case study and a potential turning point in the ongoing dialogue about digital content creation and cultural heritage. It highlights the need for greater awareness among content creators about the sensitivity and regulations surrounding historical sites worldwide.

For INAH and other heritage management bodies, the incident underscores the challenges of monitoring activities at vast sites and the importance of clear communication regarding rules and permit requirements, especially in the age of social media where content can go viral instantly. It may also prompt a review of how permits are granted and monitored for high-profile productions.

Ultimately, the preservation of sites like Chichén Itzá depends on a collective commitment to respect and responsibility – from government bodies and conservationists to tourists and global content creators. The allure of ancient wonders should inspire awe and respect, not serve as a mere backdrop for entertainment or commerce without regard for the rules designed to protect them.

As the legal process unfolds in Mexico, the incident will likely remain a point of discussion, hopefully contributing to a greater understanding of the delicate balance required to share the world's cultural heritage with a global audience while ensuring its survival for millennia to come. Content creators, particularly those with vast platforms, have a unique opportunity and responsibility to be stewards of this message, promoting respectful engagement with the past rather than actions that could jeopardize its future.