Stay Updated Icon

Subscribe to Our Tech & Career Digest

Join thousands of readers getting the latest insights on tech trends, career tips, and exclusive updates delivered straight to their inbox.

Apple Explores OpenAI and Anthropic Models to Bolster Siri's AI Capabilities

11:55 PM   |   30 June 2025

Apple Explores OpenAI and Anthropic Models to Bolster Siri's AI Capabilities

Apple's AI Ambitions: Weighing External Powerhouses for the Future of Siri

Apple, a company long known for its tightly integrated hardware and software ecosystem, is reportedly exploring a significant shift in its approach to artificial intelligence, specifically concerning its long-standing voice assistant, Siri. According to a recent report from Bloomberg, the tech giant is considering leveraging large language models (LLMs) developed by leading AI firms OpenAI and Anthropic to power an updated version of Siri.

This consideration is particularly noteworthy as Apple has been actively developing its own in-house AI capabilities, including a project internally referred to as "LLM Siri." The report indicates that while internal development continues, Apple has engaged with both OpenAI and Anthropic, asking them to train versions of their sophisticated AI models that could potentially run on Apple's cloud infrastructure for testing purposes.

The news arrives amidst reports of challenges and delays in Apple's AI development timeline. An earlier report from TechCrunch highlighted that Apple was forced to push back the planned rollout of an AI-enabled Siri, originally targeted for 2025, to 2026 or even later. These setbacks are attributed to various technical hurdles encountered during development.

Siri's Evolution and the Need for a Leap

Since its debut in 2011, Siri has been a staple of the Apple ecosystem, integrated across iPhones, iPads, Macs, Apple Watches, and HomePods. Initially revolutionary, Siri's capabilities have, in the eyes of many users and critics, lagged behind competitors like Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa, particularly in understanding complex queries and maintaining conversational context.

The advent of generative AI and large language models has dramatically raised the bar for conversational interfaces. Models like OpenAI's ChatGPT and Anthropic's Claude have demonstrated unprecedented abilities in understanding natural language, generating creative text, summarizing information, and performing complex reasoning tasks. This new wave of AI has underscored the limitations of Siri's current architecture, which relies on a more traditional, command-and-response system.

Apple's internal "LLM Siri" project is understood to be an effort to bridge this gap, aiming to imbue Siri with the kind of advanced conversational and reasoning abilities demonstrated by modern LLMs. However, building state-of-the-art LLMs is an incredibly resource-intensive and technically challenging endeavor, requiring vast amounts of data, computational power, and specialized expertise. The reported delays suggest Apple's journey in this area has not been smooth.

Why Look Outside? The Strategic Imperative

Apple's potential consideration of external AI models from OpenAI and Anthropic can be interpreted through several lenses, primarily driven by the urgent need to enhance Siri's capabilities and remain competitive in the rapidly accelerating AI race.

  • Speed to Market: Developing a foundational LLM from scratch that can rival the performance of models from companies solely focused on AI research takes significant time and resources. Partnering could allow Apple to integrate advanced AI features into Siri much faster than relying solely on its internal timeline, especially given the reported delays.
  • Leveraging Expertise: OpenAI and Anthropic are at the forefront of LLM research and development. Their models represent years of focused effort and significant investment in training and refinement. Accessing this expertise could provide Siri with a powerful, proven foundation.
  • Resource Allocation: While Apple has substantial resources, focusing its internal AI teams on integrating and fine-tuning external models, or on developing unique Apple-specific AI features (like on-device processing for privacy), might be a more efficient use of resources than building a general-purpose foundational model from the ground up.
  • Catching Up: Competitors like Google have already integrated advanced conversational AI into their products. Amazon is also working on evolving Alexa. To prevent Siri from falling further behind, Apple may see external partnerships as a necessary step to quickly bring cutting-edge AI capabilities to its users.

The Implications of a Third-Party Partnership

Integrating external LLMs into Siri would represent a notable strategic decision for Apple, a company that typically prefers to control the core technologies powering its products. Such a move comes with potential benefits and significant considerations, particularly regarding user privacy and data handling.

Potential Benefits:

  • Enhanced Capabilities: A deeper integration with models like ChatGPT or Claude could dramatically improve Siri's understanding, response generation, and ability to handle complex, multi-turn conversations.
  • Broader Knowledge Base: External LLMs are trained on vast datasets, giving them a wide range of knowledge that could make Siri more informative and helpful across diverse topics.
  • Improved User Experience: A more capable Siri could lead to increased user satisfaction and engagement with Apple's devices and services.

Key Considerations and Challenges:

  • Privacy: Apple has long emphasized user privacy as a core differentiator. Sending user queries to external servers, even if anonymized or processed on Apple's cloud infrastructure as the report suggests, raises complex privacy questions. Apple would need to implement robust safeguards and clearly communicate its data handling practices to users.
  • Control and Customization: Relying on external models means Apple has less direct control over the model's behavior, updates, and potential biases compared to an in-house solution. Customizing the model for Apple's specific needs and ecosystem might also be more challenging.
  • Cost: Licensing and running large-scale LLMs can be expensive, potentially impacting Apple's operational costs.
  • Branding and Perception: A deep integration might blur the lines between Apple's own AI capabilities and those provided by third parties, potentially affecting how users perceive Apple's innovation in AI.
  • Technical Integration: Seamlessly integrating a third-party LLM into the complex Siri architecture and ensuring it works reliably across all Apple devices is a significant technical undertaking.

Apple Intelligence and the AI Landscape

The report about exploring external models comes after Apple's significant announcements regarding "Apple Intelligence" at WWDC 2024. Apple Intelligence is positioned as a suite of generative AI features deeply integrated into iOS, iPadOS, and macOS, focusing on personal context, privacy (with a mix of on-device and Private Cloud Compute processing), and helpfulness.

Apple Software Engineering SVP Craig Federighi, seen presenting Apple Intelligence at WWDC 2024
Image Credits: Apple

While Apple Intelligence includes features that enhance Siri, the Bloomberg report suggests that the core conversational engine for future, more advanced Siri interactions might still be an open question, or that Apple is seeking external help to accelerate or supplement its efforts, especially for tasks requiring the broadest general knowledge or complex reasoning that might exceed the capabilities of initial on-device or Private Cloud Compute models.

The AI industry is marked by intense competition and rapid advancements. Companies like Google, Meta, and others are heavily investing in developing and deploying their own powerful AI models. Meta, for instance, recently restructured its AI unit to focus on 'Superintelligence Labs,' signaling its commitment to pushing the boundaries of AI.

Meanwhile, companies like Anthropic are not only focused on model development but also on understanding the broader societal impacts of AI, such as launching programs to track AI's economic fallout, as reported by TechCrunch. This highlights the multifaceted nature of the AI race, extending beyond just model performance to include safety, ethics, and economic implications.

The legal landscape surrounding AI is also evolving rapidly, with ongoing discussions and legal battles against publishers regarding the data used to train these models. Navigating this complex environment is another challenge for any company seeking to integrate advanced AI.

The Road Ahead for Siri

Apple's reported exploration of external LLMs for Siri underscores the significant pressure it faces to modernize its voice assistant and keep pace with the rapid advancements in AI. While the company continues its internal "LLM Siri" development, engaging with OpenAI and Anthropic suggests a pragmatic approach to potentially accelerate the delivery of next-generation AI capabilities to its vast user base.

The decision of whether to rely on internal models, integrate external ones, or pursue a hybrid approach will have profound implications for Siri's future capabilities, Apple's AI strategy, and its competitive standing in the tech industry. Factors influencing this decision will likely include the performance and privacy characteristics of the external models, the progress of Apple's internal development, the costs involved, and Apple's ability to maintain its strong focus on user privacy while utilizing cloud-based AI.

For users, a more capable Siri, potentially powered by the likes of OpenAI or Anthropic, could transform their interaction with Apple devices, making the voice assistant a truly intelligent and indispensable personal assistant. However, they will also be keen to understand how Apple plans to safeguard their data and privacy in this new era of AI-powered interactions.

As the AI landscape continues to evolve at breakneck speed, Apple's strategic choices regarding Siri will be closely watched, shaping not only the future of its voice assistant but also its broader position in the age of artificial intelligence.