Stay Updated Icon

Subscribe to Our Tech & Career Digest

Join thousands of readers getting the latest insights on tech trends, career tips, and exclusive updates delivered straight to their inbox.

Trump Claims "Very Wealthy People" Group Has Found a Buyer for TikTok Amidst Ongoing Ban Saga

8:51 PM   |   29 June 2025

Trump Claims "Very Wealthy People" Group Has Found a Buyer for TikTok Amidst Ongoing Ban Saga

Trump Claims "Very Wealthy People" Group Has Found a Buyer for TikTok Amidst Ongoing Ban Saga

In a surprising turn of events in the long-running drama surrounding the future of TikTok in the United States, President Donald Trump announced that a group of "very wealthy people" has identified a potential buyer for the immensely popular short-form video application. Speaking in a Sunday morning interview, Trump stated, "We have a buyer for TikTok, by the way." This declaration injects a new element of speculation and anticipation into a situation marked by political pressure, national security concerns, and complex international relations.

The President offered few immediate details about the prospective buyers, stating that he would reveal their identities in approximately two weeks. This timeframe, which he has used previously in other contexts, adds a layer of suspense to the announcement, leaving observers and stakeholders guessing about the parties involved and the specifics of any potential deal. The lack of concrete information at this stage underscores the often opaque nature of high-stakes negotiations involving global technology giants and government mandates.

Trump and TikTok logo
Image Credits: Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images

Crucially, Trump acknowledged the significant hurdle posed by international approvals. "I think I'll need probably China's approval," he remarked, adding, "I think President Xi [Jinping] will probably do it." This recognition highlights the dual nature of the challenge: not only must a buyer be found and a deal struck under U.S. pressure, but the transaction must also navigate the regulatory landscape and political will of the Chinese government, which has previously indicated its opposition to a forced sale of ByteDance's core technology.

A Shifting Stance on TikTok

President Trump's current position on TikTok represents a notable evolution from his earlier, more aggressive stance. During his previous term, he sought to ban the app outright through executive orders, citing national security risks related to data collection and potential Chinese government influence. These orders faced legal challenges and were ultimately not implemented.

The pressure on TikTok intensified with the passage of a bipartisan bill in Congress earlier this year. This legislation, signed into law, mandates that ByteDance must sell its U.S. assets within a specified timeframe (initially 270 days, with a potential extension) or face a prohibition on app stores and web hosting services in the United States. This legislative action provided a clear legal framework for the divestment demand, putting ByteDance under significant pressure to find a solution.

However, President Trump has repeatedly delayed the enforcement deadline associated with this bill. These extensions have fueled speculation about the administration's strategy and potential alternative outcomes, including a sale, a complex joint venture, or perhaps even a scenario where the ban is further postponed or avoided.

In January, Trump had suggested an alternative approach, stating his "initial thought" was to pursue "a joint venture between the current owners and/or new owners whereby the U.S. gets a 50% ownership." This idea of a shared ownership structure, while unconventional for a forced divestment scenario, indicated a potential openness to solutions beyond a complete sale, possibly aiming to ensure U.S. oversight and control over the platform's operations and data handling.

He had also previously expressed openness to prominent American business figures like Larry Ellison or Elon Musk acquiring the app. While Ellison's interest has been reported in the past, Musk's relationship with Trump has appeared strained more recently, potentially making him a less likely candidate for such a politically charged acquisition.

The Divest-or-Ban Legislation: Context and Implications

The legislative push for TikTok's divestment stems from deep-seated concerns among U.S. lawmakers and intelligence officials regarding the potential for the Chinese government to access the data of American users or influence the content they see on the platform. As a subsidiary of ByteDance, a company based in China, TikTok operates under a different legal and political system than U.S.-based social media companies. Critics argue that Chinese national security laws could compel ByteDance to cooperate with intelligence agencies, potentially compromising U.S. national interests.

Proponents of the ban legislation argue that a forced sale to a U.S.-based entity is the only way to mitigate these risks effectively. The idea is that under U.S. ownership, TikTok's operations, data storage, and content moderation policies would be subject to American laws and oversight, thereby addressing the perceived national security threat.

However, the path to divestment is fraught with significant challenges:

  • Valuation: TikTok's U.S. operations are estimated to be worth tens of billions of dollars, potentially exceeding $100 billion. Finding a buyer or consortium with the financial capacity and willingness to undertake such a massive acquisition is difficult.
  • Technological Separation: TikTok relies heavily on ByteDance's underlying technology, including its powerful recommendation algorithms. Separating these systems and intellectual property while maintaining the app's core functionality and user experience is a complex technical undertaking. China's government has also signaled that it would oppose the export of such algorithms.
  • Regulatory Hurdles: Any sale would require approval not only from the U.S. government but also from Chinese regulators. Beijing has made it clear it views the forced sale as coercive and has the power to block the export of technology or impose other conditions that could scuttle a deal.
  • Legal Challenges: ByteDance and TikTok have filed lawsuits challenging the constitutionality of the U.S. divestment law, arguing it violates free speech rights and constitutes an unlawful taking of property. These legal battles could take time to resolve and potentially delay or overturn the ban.
  • User and Creator Impact: TikTok boasts over 170 million users in the U.S. and is a primary source of income and audience for millions of creators. A ban or disruptive sale process could have significant economic and social consequences.

Who Are the Potential Buyers?

While President Trump did not name the potential buyers, speculation has long surrounded various individuals and consortia. Previous discussions have included:

  • Oracle: The software giant was involved in a proposed deal during the Trump administration that would have seen it become TikTok's U.S. technology partner, storing U.S. user data. This deal, known as "Project Texas," aimed to address security concerns without a full sale, but its status and effectiveness have been debated.
  • Microsoft: Microsoft previously explored acquiring TikTok's U.S. operations but was unsuccessful.
  • Private Equity Firms and Investor Groups: Given the immense cost, a purchase would likely involve a consortium of private equity firms or wealthy investors pooling resources. These groups would need deep pockets and the ability to navigate the complex regulatory and political landscape.
  • Other Tech Companies: While less likely due to antitrust concerns and the sheer scale of the acquisition, other major tech players have occasionally been mentioned in speculative discussions.

The President's reference to a group of "very wealthy people" suggests the potential buyer might be a consortium of high-net-worth individuals, possibly with ties to the U.S. tech or investment sectors. Their ability to secure the necessary funding, navigate U.S. regulatory approval, and, critically, gain the assent of the Chinese government remains the central challenge.

The Role of China and ByteDance

ByteDance has consistently maintained that it does not share U.S. user data with the Chinese government and has invested billions in efforts, like Project Texas with Oracle, to wall off U.S. data and operations. The company views the U.S. divestment law as unfair and politically motivated.

The Chinese government has also voiced strong opposition to a forced sale. Beijing views ByteDance and TikTok as national champions in the global tech arena and is wary of setting a precedent where foreign governments can compel Chinese companies to sell valuable assets. China has implemented export control rules that could potentially block the transfer of the algorithms that make TikTok so successful, effectively preventing a viable sale that doesn't include this core technology.

President Trump's comment that he believes President Xi Jinping "will probably do it" (approve the sale) is a significant assertion. It suggests either a level of communication or understanding between the two sides that is not publicly known, or it could be a statement of hope or political posturing. Gaining Beijing's approval is arguably the most unpredictable variable in the entire process.

What Happens Next?

The President's announcement, while lacking specifics, reignites the conversation about TikTok's future and puts the focus back on the possibility of a sale. The next two weeks, the timeframe Trump provided for revealing the buyers, will be critical.

Key questions remain unanswered:

  • Who are the potential buyers, and do they have the financial and operational capacity to acquire and run TikTok's U.S. business?
  • What are the terms of the proposed deal, and how would it address U.S. national security concerns?
  • Will ByteDance agree to the sale, or will it continue to pursue its legal challenges against the U.S. law?
  • Will the Chinese government approve the sale, particularly the transfer of necessary technology and intellectual property?
  • If a deal is not finalized, will the U.S. government proceed with enforcing the ban, or will there be further delays or alternative solutions proposed?

The situation remains highly fluid, influenced by legal battles, political negotiations, and the complex interplay between the U.S. and Chinese governments. The fate of TikTok in the U.S. is not just a business transaction; it's a geopolitical flashpoint with significant implications for freedom of expression, data privacy, and the global technology landscape.

As the clock continues to tick towards the potential enforcement deadline (even with extensions), the pressure on ByteDance to find a resolution intensifies. Whether this newly announced potential buyer represents a genuine breakthrough or another twist in the ongoing saga remains to be seen. The world will be watching closely for the details promised in the coming weeks.

The possibility of a sale, while complex, offers a potential path forward that could allow TikTok to continue operating in the U.S. under new ownership, satisfying the demands of U.S. lawmakers while preserving the platform for its millions of users and creators. However, the hurdles, particularly securing approval from both Washington and Beijing, are formidable.

This development underscores the unique position TikTok occupies at the intersection of technology, culture, and international politics. Its immense popularity has made it a target for governments concerned about data security and foreign influence, setting the stage for an unprecedented regulatory challenge that could reshape the global social media landscape.

The coming weeks will likely provide more clarity, but the journey of TikTok in the U.S. has been anything but straightforward, and further unexpected turns would not be surprising.